A Genius or a Nut Case? Diamond 14and he went racing off the idea of all the Seibel answers in the entire world. Well, my perspective of what his purpose of the book was to bore us to death. His perspective of the world shows of nothing but facts, facts, facts!
The earliest humanoid species, such as Homo habilis and then Homo erectus, emerged about seven million years ago in Africa. One million years ago, Homo erectus began to migrate, out of Africa and around the world—to Europe, Australia, Asia, etc.
It is usually argued that humans—that is, Homo sapiens—first emerged from the evolutionary tree half a million years ago, having evolved independently from Homo erectus around the world. Nevertheless, scientists and anthropologists generally agree that Homo sapiens are distinguished from some of their ancestors by their larger skulls and their ability to make fire.
First, notice that there is no precise way to measure when Homo sapiens first emerged from the evolutionary tree—as is often the case in the book, scientists have to approximate and make educated guesses.
Second, notice that Homo sapiens, the species to which modern human beings belong, are distinguished by their ability to make fire—in a sense, their ability to interact with their environments and make use of available resources.
They could have arisen simultaneously in many different parts of the world, or spread from one part to other parts. But in either case, the Great Leap was crucial to human history.
Echoing the themes of the previous passage, human history is presented as a record of how human beings have shaped their environments and used certain resources to make useful tools. In New Guinea, there is archaeological evidence that humans exterminated many animals soon after arriving.
Other scientists argue that many species in New Guinea went extinct because of unrelated changes in the environment, such as drought. Nevertheless, the possibility that early human beings wiped out entire animal populations arguably anticipates the way that later societies wiped out populations in the regions they colonized, suggesting that aggression is a fundamental part of human nature.
Active Themes By 40, B. Hunter-gatherer cultures entered the Americas through Asia, probably across the Bering land bridge, and quickly migrated south to Patagonia.
There is a lot of disagreement over which peoples were the first to come through America. Some scientists think that a people called the Clovis came through America about 15, years ago and exterminated many of the large animals in the region much like what may have happened in New Guinea.
Evidence of Clovis settlements have been found in the western United States, and farther south, but there is also evidence of earlier settlements from other peoples.
Also, notice that the Clovis may have wiped out most of the large mammals in the Americas—echoing the possible exterminations of large animals in New Guinea.
The possibility that the earliest humans around the world massacred animals and other humans suggests that humans have always drastically altered their environments, often in destructive ways. Humans settled many different parts of the world after the Great Leap.
This all leads to the question: And even today, there is more genetic diversity in Africa than anywhere else on the planet, reflecting the large numbers of protohumans in Africa millions of years ago. And yet, 11, years ago, one could have made different, fairly convincing arguments that each colonized continent was going to become the dominant one.
Africa had the most people and the most genetic diversity. But people in Australia had already developed sophisticated boats and other technologies, beyond what people in Africa had built. In Eurasia, there was more geographic diversity than anywhere else on the planet, suggesting that people who lived in Eurasia would adapt to many different environments and therefore colonize many different parts of the world.
There are too many different explanations of why certain regions of the world flourish and why others do not. No single one of these explanations, at least as offered in this section, is entirely convincing. For example, European pseudo-scientists might argue—and have argued—that their people are superior because they had to respond to the cold climate.
Active Themes In short, Diamond says, you could have made an argument that any region of the globe where there were humans 11, years ago was going to become the most powerful and dominant one. Diamond will go on to discuss why the Eurasian region went on to become the most powerful.
Diamond aims to offer a thorough, comprehensive explanation of why humans from certain parts of the world became the most dominant.
In doing so, he hopes to eliminate all bias—historical, racial, and otherwise. Up to the Starting Line.Reaction Guns Germs and Steel assignment. Hunter Gibson. Words: Really liked the video and thought it was real interesting.
I do pretty much agree to what I have heard so far. Agree that all the great civilizations had in common that they all had advanced technology, a large population, and an organized work for. I think the same applies. Buy The Selfish Gene: 40th Anniversary Edition (Oxford Landmark Science) on tranceformingnlp.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders.
In the documentary, Jared Diamond believes it was because of the guns, germs and steel that the Europeans possessed. The Spanish brought a great number of items when they came to the new world. So there is a website out there, Educational Realist (via Steve Sailer), which made me aware of some statistics from ETS on the intellectual aptitudes of those who passed a teaching certification.
In Chapter 4 of Listen To Your Gut, I write about the dangers of Teflon-coated (and other non-stick coated) pots and pans and give you all the data on why we shouldn’t use them.. Well, following is an interesting article from the New York Times, written by someone else who heard about the dangers of Teflon and set out to test a number of different pans . Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies ( ) (henceforth GGS) may well be one of the most important books published in the final. Reflection on Guns, Germs, and Steel. Germs, and Steel Jarred Diamond: A Genius or a Nut Case? My Review of Guns, Germs, and Steel It was the prehistory of the world that drew attention to Diamond’s brain that gave him the wonderful thought of writing this book about how our world is today, with the differences of culture, cargo, religions, skin color, etc.
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Guns, Germs, and Steel, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work. Geographic Determinism Racism, Violence, and Colonization. Reflection on Guns, Germs, and Steel. Germs, and Steel Jarred Diamond: A Genius or a Nut Case?
My Review of Guns, Germs, and Steel It was the prehistory of the world that drew attention to Diamond’s brain that gave him the wonderful thought of writing this book about how our world is today, with the differences of culture, cargo, religions, skin color, etc.